Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1985 (1) TMI 113

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... to his wife and after allowing exemption of Rs. 50,000 under s. 5(1) (viii) of the GT Act, 1958 he brought the balance of Rs. 34,330. to gift-tax by his order dt. 15th march, 1982. According toe the GTO, the assessee, during the previous year, on 2nd April, 1976, relevant to the asst. yr. 1977-78, renewed the deposit of Rs. 25,000 (which was originally made by the assessee in his own name on 2nd April, 1974) in the name of his wife Smt. L. Saraswathy Amma. He treated this as a gift by the assessee to his wife and brought it to tax by his order dt. 15th March, 1982. 3. Aggrieved by the orders of the GTO the assessee preferred appeals to the first appellate authority. Before the first appellate authority the assessee contended that the de .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... deposits in his WT returns and the assessment by the WTO treating the said deposits as the assessee's wealth are not relevant to the issue for gift-tax purposes. There was express acceptance on the part of the assessee's wife of the gifts made by the assessee when she made applications for making fixed deposits in the bank. The theory of convenience cannot be accepted because certain later deposits made by the assessee were in the joint names of the assessee to his wife. The assessee could have made the deposits under appeal in the joint names if he really meant convenience. He could not have made these deposits under appeal in the single name of his wife. 6. The assessee's counsel in reply stated that the assessee had not shown the depo .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ealth taking into consideration the fixed deposits of Rs. 5,23,632. For the asst. yr. 1977-78, the assessee had shown the fixed deposits dt. 2nd April, 1976 of Rs. 25,000 standing in his wife's name as his own wealth and the WTO taxed him accordingly by his order dt. 15th Sept., 1983. The assessee always treated the deposit standing in his wife's name as his own wealth. The GTO, in his capacity as WTO having assessed the fixed deposits standing in the name of the assessee's wife as the assessee's own wealth in his assessment order dt. 10th Jun, 1981 passed in pursuance of he order of the Settlement Commission, cannot turn round and say that the very same deposits constituted gifts made by the assessee to his wife and tax them by gift-tax or .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates