Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1994 (8) TMI 75

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d as commission to Shri Subodh Kumar, son of one of the partners, namely, Shri Chander Sain Jain, who had 50 per cent share in the firm. The claim was rejected on the ground that in the previous year no such amount had been paid to anybody and further the said Shri Subodh Kumar had been paid a salary of Rs. 1,000 per month in the preceding assessment year for the same work. The ITO further noted that Shri Subodh Kumar was a partner in a firm atDelhilooking after its business affairs and it was difficult for him to look after the affairs of the present firm as well. It was further observed in the assessment order that the "excess amount" had been allowed to Shri Subodh Kumar merely because he was the son of the partner. 3. On further appea .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... aining to the travelling expenses of Shri Subodh Kumar. A reference was also made to the statement of Shri Subodh Kumar recorded on2nd Jan., 1987wherein he had admitted that he was involved in the purchase of sarees for the assessee-firm. The statement was also referred to by the CIT(A) for the finding that the amount of commission had been left with the assessee-firm to be withdrawn on convenient dates as Shri Subodh Kumar wanted to construct a house for himself. In the final analysis the CIT(A) held that Shri Subodh Kumar had been actively involved in the assessee's business and there had been enormous expansion vis-a-vis the sales. He accordingly deleted the addition. 6. We have heard both the parties at some length in respect of the s .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... details under the head "salary paid" and also referred to the statements on oath recorded in respect of certain employees and wherein they had categorically admitted that they had received the amount mentioned in the books of account. It was further pointed out that the salary paid was commensurate with the amount paid in the preceding assessment year. 8. The CIT(A) accepted the aforesaid arguments with specific reference to the factor that the sales had increased by nearly Rs. 9 lakhs and the assessee had to employ more persons to take care of the sales. He also recorded a finding to the fact that the amount claimed was neither unreasonable nor excessive especially when various employees had confirmed having received the quantum of salar .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... be deleted. 12. The CIT(A) considered the aforesaid submissions and held that the cases of the two firms referred to by the ITO were not comparable cases and only the past records of the assessee were to be the relevant factor to decide the reasonableness of the G.P. disclosed. He, however, took note of the two "defects" pointed out by the ITO vis-a-vis the valuation of the closing stock as also the quantitative tally. In the final analysis, he estimated the sales at Rs. 32 lakhs and applied a G.P. rate of 15% resulting in a relief of Rs. 48,000 to the assessee. 13. The learned Departmental Representative vehemently supported the order of the ITO and took us through the various observations recorded by the ITO in making the impugned ad .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ntal Representative stated that the observation in the case of another assessee could not tantamount to the approval of the G.P. rate disclosed by the assessee and especially when in the assessee's own assessment the ITO had made an addition. 16. We have examined the rival submissions and have also perused the material on record to which our attention was invited. The decisions cited at the bar have also been duly considered. On the facts of the case, we are of the view that no addition whatsoever is required to be sustained. The past history of the case shows that the trading results had been accepted all along in the past as also in the subsequent assessment years sometimes in 143(1) assessment and yet again in 143(3) assessments. For t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates