1986 (10) TMI 228

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Advocate for the Appellants. Shri M.C. Thakur, S.D.R., for the Respondent. [Order per : B. Prasad, Member (J)]. - Heard Shri Das and Shri Thakur for some time. 2.On account of the view that we are going to take in this appeal, we do not propose to enter into the merits of the case. 3. It appears that originally by Order-in-Original No. 208/(22F)80-Collector-20/81 dated 2-3-1981, t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rder-in-Original No. 208/(22F)80-Collr-20/81 dated 2-3-1981 . 5. This shows that even on de novo examination, the learned Collector did not proceed to award any fine or penalty on the appellants. He only confirmed the earlier order passed by him which had already been set aside by the learned Board. 6. It may be mentioned here that setting aside of the order of the Collector by the learned Boa .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X