Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Article Section

Home Articles Other Topics YAGAY andSUN Experts This

Legal Status of Undersea Internet Cables (also known as submarine communications cables) During Armed Conflict Under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).[Part 1 of 2]

Submit New Article

Discuss this article

Legal Status of Undersea Internet Cables (also known as submarine communications cables) During Armed Conflict Under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).[Part 1 of 2]
YAGAY andSUN By: YAGAY andSUN
May 12, 2025
All Articles by: YAGAY andSUN       View Profile
  • Contents

The undersea internet cables, also known as submarine communications cables, are critical infrastructure enabling global internet and communications. These cables fall under certain protections provided by international law, including the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). Let’s break this down:

🔹 What does UNCLOS say about undersea cables?

  • Article 112 to 115 of UNCLOS specifically deals with submarine cables.
  • Under peacetime, all countries have the right to lay and maintain submarine cables on the high seas.
  • Intentional damage or destruction of these cables is prohibited under Article 113, and states are required to criminalize such acts.

🔹 Can a country cut undersea cables during war?

This is a gray area, but here’s what we know:

In Peacetime:

  • No, a country cannot cut another nation’s submarine cable.
  • Such an act would violate UNCLOS and could amount to an international offense or act of aggression.

⚔️ During War (Armed Conflict):

  • Under the Law of Armed Conflict (LOAC) or International Humanitarian Law (IHL), the situation changes.
  • A belligerent state may target enemy infrastructure if it offers a definite military advantage.
  • If an undersea cable is used for military communications, then it could be considered a legitimate target.
  • However, targeting civilian communications cables without a military rationale could be seen as a violation of IHL.

🔍 Relevant Legal Ambiguities:

  • UNCLOS does not explicitly regulate wartime conduct.
  • No specific global treaty exists governing undersea cables during war.
  • Customary international law and state practice guide wartime behavior, which leaves room for interpretation and abuse.

🔒 Is there any international move to protect cables further?

Yes, there are increasing discussions at forums like the International Cable Protection Committee (ICPC) and United Nations, especially as cybersecurity and geopolitical tensions rise. However, no dedicated wartime treaty exists yet.

Summary:

Situation

Can a country cut undersea cables?

Legality

Peacetime

❌ No

Violation of UNCLOS

Wartime (Military Cable)

✅ Possibly, if for military advantage

Permissible under International Humanitarian Law

Wartime (Civilian Cable)

❌ Not unless militarily necessary

Likely a violation of international law

 

 

By: YAGAY andSUN - May 12, 2025

 

 

Discuss this article

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates