Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1988 (5) TMI 135

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... denied the concession to the appellants in respect of naptha relatable to quantity of vented gas for the period 29.9.79 to 2.10.79. In appeal the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) gave benefit of doubt to the appellants in respect of gases arising from burning of raw naptha on 29.9.79 but otherwise confirmed the demand. Aggrieved with this order the appellants have filed appeal to this Tribunal. 3. At the hearing of the appeal Shri J. Banerjee, learned Advocate for the appellants and Shri L.C. Chakraborty, learned JDR for the respondent were heard and papers perused. Shri Banerjee submitted that exemption under the notification is available if raw naptha is intended for specified use. Raw naptha in fact was obtained for specified use .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s have been placed to appreciate or controvert this finding. We see no reason to controvert this finding. As for Shri Banerjee s emphasis on use of the word intended in the notification, it has to be read not in isolation but with other conditions of the notification which has already been reproduced above. It appears that raw naptha was obtained for manufacture of urea but gas obtained from the same had to be vented due to negligence of the appellants and not due to any technological necessity. If therefore the lower authorities held that condition No. (i) of the notification as to proof to the satisfaction of the Asst. Collector had not been fulfilled, we see no infirmity in the same. 5. We, therefore, dismiss the appeal and affirm th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... to be satisfied :- 1. there is the satisfaction of the Asstt. Collector that raw naptha brought is intended for use in the manufacture of fertilizers; 2. Chapter X has to be followed and the requirements set out thereunder have to be satisfied. The appellants have pleaded that they hold a L-6 Licence under which they were allowed to get raw naptha at concessional rate of duty. So far as the proviso (1) under para 1 of the notification is concerned, the same is satisfied it is not In dispute that the appellants were allowed to receive raw naptha which was issued only on the satisfaction that appellants intended to use the same for the manufacture of fertilizers. He however, could not produce a copy of L-6 licence as also an application .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ocess for the production of fertilizer. It is not a case of the appellants that the plant was fully operational for the purpose of production of fertilizer. They have accepted that because of the break down of some equipment, the manufacturing stream for the fertilizer had been interrupted. It appears from the record that raw naptha was continued to be fed as an input for some technical reasons despite the fact that the plant was not operational for the purpose of manufacture of fertilizer and the gases produced out of the raw naptha were not taken further in the manufacturing stream of fertilizer and were flared out. The picture that emerges from this is that the appellants knew that the fertilizer could not be produced when raw naptha was .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... red to be paid if the goods obtained at concessional rate of duty are not duly accounted for as having been used for the purpose and in the manner stated in the application for getting the goods at concessional rates unless it can be shown to the proper officer that these have been lost or destroyed by natural causes or unavoidable accident during transport from the place of procurement to the packing premises or during handling or in storage. 9. It is not the case of the appellants that the goods were lost or destroyed as set out under Rule 196. Since I have held that the goods had not been used for the purpose of manufacture of fertilizer, duty is to be paid on them under Rule 196. I, therefore, reject the appeal. - - TaxTMI - TMIT .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates