9911796707
TMI Blog2009 (12) TMI 218X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... years 1995-96, 1996-97, 1997-98, and 1998-99. In all these years it declared its income as "agricultural income" and, therefore, claimed exemption from payment of income-tax. The Assessing Officer passed separate assessment orders from time to time in respect of all these assessment years. He arrived at a finding that the income shown was not "agricultural income" and treated the same as "income ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he date when the matter was heard. This application of the assessee was rejected. Against that order a writ petition was filed before this court. The order dated November 17, 2009, set aside the order of the Tribunal in the said miscellaneous application and directed the Tribunal to consider the application afresh. 3. The Tribunal, thereafter, bestowed its fresh consideration on the said applicat ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... facts of this case and on that basis allowed the appeals after arriving at a finding that there was no agricultural income of the assessee in these assessment years. 5. The appellant argues that the appellant had no occasion to make effective submissions opposing the appeals filed by the Department inasmuch as counsel for the assessee was not available on that date. The hearing was attended by M ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e set aside the decision dated November 11, 2005, given by the Tribunal in these appeals. We may clarify that we have not at all gone into the findings recorded by the Tribunal and have not made any comments there against. It would be for the Tribunal to go into these aspects which are taken note of in the order dated November 11, 2005. Of course, at the same time the submissions which would be ma ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
