2009 (8) TMI 678

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... R 1. The applicant is a State Government undertaking. As per the Apex Court's judgment in Oil & Natural Gas Corpn. Ltd. v. City & Industrial Development Corpn., Maharashtra Ltd. [2007] 7 SCC 39, their Lordships had directed that a Committee be formed to sort out the differences between the Central Government and State Government entities. It was laid down that such Committee shall consist of Cabi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 2. The stay application is filed by the applicant against the order of Commissioner (Appeals) wherein a demand of Rs. 2,70,027 along with interest and equivalent amount of penalty was confirmed. Aggrieved by the same, the applicant is before me. 3. Heard both sides. 4. The applicants submit that they have already paid an amount of Rs. 2,70,027 on 22-3-2004 against the differential tax liabilit .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X