9911796707
TMI Blog1998 (1) TMI 276X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... lant. None, for the Respondents. [Order per : K.S. Venkataramani, Member (T)]. - The present appeal has been filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-II against the Order dated 12-5-1993 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Mumbai. The impugned order is a common order disposing of four appeals filed by the department before that authority; it is the case of the De ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d excisable goods namely fancy yarn, the Assistant Commissioner had held that the show cause notices are not sustainable and dropped the proceedings. The Commissioner (Appeals) in the impugned order found no infirmity in the order passed by the Assistant Commissioner and rejected the Department's (Appeals). None is present for the Respondents. The ld. DR, Shri D. Gurnani pointed out that it is app ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
