1999 (9) TMI 302

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... .R. Rakshe, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri Deepak Kumar, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : J.H. Joglekar, Member (T)]. - These 13 appeals were posted together for early hearing. We have heard Shri S.R. Rakshe, Advocate for the appellants and Shri Deepak Kumar for the Revenue. 2. In disposing of the stay applications the Tribunal in their order had made the following observations:- .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... er at this stage itself. At this stage, the departmental representative requires some time. We, therefore, think it proper to post this appeal for final hearing on 2nd June, 1999 after granting unconditional stay and waiver of the penalties imposed on each of the applicants. The case is posted for final disposal on 2nd June, 1999." 3. The system of departmental adjudication is governed by th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ew quashed the orders impugned before the Court. The observation made was that in reaching the conclusions the authorities had not applied their mind to the questions that arose before them and had not written speaking orders as enjoined on them. In making this observation the Court relied upon the Supreme Court judgment in the case of Siemens Engg. &. Mfg. Co. of India Ltd. v. U.O.I. - 1986 (25) .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X