2000 (3) TMI 244

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... In the order impugned in this appeal the Commissioner (Appeals) has held that the failure by the assessee to include the correct classification in the Modvat declaration of the inputs did not disqualify it from taking credit. 2.  I have heard the Departmental Representative. The respondent is absent and unrepresented despite notice. 3. I do not question the averments in the departmen .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the appeal. Further there are decisions of this Tribunal to the effect that since classification is not always uniform there may be difference in classification of the same product from area to area, and therefore the fact of the input being classified differently in the gate pass from its classification in the 57G declaration should not result in Modvat credit being denied. The description of the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X