TMI Blog2000 (4) TMI 278X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... mtake, JDR, for the Respondents. [Order per : J.H. Joglekar, Member (T)]. - These two appeals involve the common issue where the appellant is the same. These are, therefore, being disposed of by this common order. 2. The appellants manufactured boxes for housing chokes for fluorescent tubes on job work basis. The names of the end-users were embossed on these boxes. In the impugned orders ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he Collectors that the SSI units manufacturing labels/collapsible tubes/crown corks/pp caps would in similar circumstances merit the benefit. Similar was the ratio of the judgment in the case of Ravi Metalloids [1993 (63) E.L.T 326 (Tri)] as also 1999 (109) E.L.T. 950 (Tribunal) = 1999 (32) RLT 42. We have also been shown Madras High Court judgment reported in 1990 (49) E.L.T 33 with identical wor ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... hese in the course of trade but to the manufacturers of the meters and therefore the phrase "during the course of trade" used to explain the "brand name" would not be attracted. 6. The subject Notification itself interpreted the phrase "brand name or trade name". Put in a very simple manner, it is the definite relationship between a particular manufacturer and a particular commodity. For thi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|