2000 (8) TMI 286

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nd Tarun Gulati, Advocate for the Respondent. S/Shri V. Lakshmi Kumaran and R. Parthasarthy, Advocates, for the Interested Parties. [Order per : C.N.B. Nair, Member (T)]. - This appeal is directed against the imposition of anti-dumping duty on imports of 'Sodium Cyanide' under notification No. 83/2000, dated 6-6-2000. The duty imposed is the difference between the amount mentioned in Column (4 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... cation also imposed duty, following the recommendations of the Designated Authority, xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx in rupee terms. 3. During hearing, the learned counsel for the appellants emphasised that their request for imposition of duty in rupee terms is in conformity with several decisions of this Tribunal on the subject. He relied on the following observations of the CEGAT in final order Nos. 6 to .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... in the exchange rate." This decision was followed in final order No. 20 & 21/2000-AD, dated 2-2-2000 [2000 (112) E.L.T. 625 (Tribunal)] in appeal Nos. C/264/99-AD and C/332/99-AD with C/Stay/1383/99-AD with the observations as under :- "In BLA Industries & Others final order Nos. 6-15/2000-AD, dated 21-1-2000, we took the view that the Anti-Dumping Duty should be imposed on US $. Otherwise, the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... be, and that would be in violation of the provisions of law relating to anti-dumping duty, as such duty cannot be in excess of injury margin or dumping margin, whichever is less. 5. The learned senior counsel for the Government has opposed the plea raised by learned counsel for the interested parties stating that an interested party in an anti-dumping appeal is in the position of an interve .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... (2) (3) (4) 1. United States of America. All exporters 1608.16 2. European Union M/s Degussa Huls. (i) All other exporters. (ii) 1608.16 1608.16 3. Czech Republic All exporters 1608.16 4. Korea RP All exporters 1608.16 7. We find the objection raised on behalf of the interested parties to be beyond their competence. Accordingly, the same is rejected.
Case la .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X