2000 (4) TMI 432

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... , DR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Jyoti Balasundaram, Member (J)]. - In this case, the Adjudicating Authority has confirmed a duty demand of Rs. 3,10,551/- on 89.625 MTs of Brass Scrap classifiable under CET sub-heading 7402.00 manufactured and cleared during the period January 1987 to May 1987 and has imposed a penalty of Rs. 25,000/- on the appellants herein. 2. The learned Counsel .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ) E.L.T. 539] in support of his contention. 3. The learned DR reiterates the findings of the Collector and submits that the process adopted by the appellants has resulted in the emergence of a different chemical commodity and therefore, duty demand is justified, as well as penal action against the appellants. 4. We have heard both the sides and perused the order relied upon by the lear .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X