2000 (11) TMI 550

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Respondent. [Order per : S.S. Kang, Member (T)]. -  In this case, the benefit of Notification No. 1/93-C.E. was denied to the appellant on the ground that they were clearing the goods i.e. Typing machine under the brand name of foreign manufacturer. 2. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant said that the appellants were importing parts of machines bearing the name of for .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... eme Court and the Board has issued a Circular dated 18-1-2000 to decide the pending cases as per the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Vimal Printery & Ors. He, therefore, submits that the appeal be allowed. 3. Learned SDR reiterates the finding of the lower authority. In the present case the appellants were importing the components and parts of machines bearing the name of manufacture .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X