2001 (2) TMI 766

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ate, for the Respondent. [Order per : Archana Wadhwa. Member, (J)]. - After rejecting the stay petition filed by the Revenue, we take up the appeal itself as the issue involved lies in a narrow compass. 2. After hearing both the sides duly represented by Shri V.K. Chaturvedi, ld. SDR and Shri V. Sreedharan, ld. Adv., we find that vide impugned order Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... esh decision after the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court. We do not find any infirmity in the said order of the Commissioner (Appeals) and we fail to understand as to how the Revenue could feel aggrieved with such order of remand especially when the earlier order of the Tribunal were in favour of the respondents. Accordingly in view of the foregoing we reject the appeal filed by the Revenue. S .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X