9911796707
TMI Blog2001 (7) TMI 905X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Respondent. [Order per : Jeet Ram Kait, Member (T)]. - This subject appeal has been filed by the Revenue against the Order-in-Original No. 16/96, dated 11-3-1996 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Hyderabad. 2. The Respondents had filed an appeal and stay application against the Order-in-Original No. C. Ex. 16/96, dt. 11-3-96 passed by the Commissioner of Customs and Centr ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, Hyderabad-I passed Order-in-Original No. 25/97, dt. 31-10-97. The appellants filed an appeal and stay application against the said Order-in-Original No. 25/97, dt. 31-10-97 passed by the Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, Hyderabad-I Commissionerate, Hyderabad. The said Appeals along with the Stay applications were filed and registered as E/Stay ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... cisions in the case of TELCO v. CCE, Pune reported in [1987 (32) E.L.T. 583 (T)] and the High Court of Judicature at Calcutta in the matter reported in [1979 (4) E.L.T. (J 457)]. He also drew our attention to para 7 of the above order which is extracted herein below. "7. In the circumstances, the Collector of Central Excise, Pune, had no jurisdiction to set aside the Assistant Collector's or ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
