2002 (6) TMI 261

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Narasimha Murthy, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : G.A. Brahma Deva, Member (J) (Oral)]. These are two appeals filed by the appellants. Arguing in support of the application to condone the delay in filing these appeals, Shri Nagaraj accompanied by Shri T.R. Shastry, submitted that there was no delay in filing these appeals. He explained the circumstances under which the appellant wa .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e Hon ble Supreme Court had allowed the Civil appeal Nos. 52-63/98 and that the appellants were required to pay the penalty imposed by the adjudicating authority. The appellant s Counsel contended that in a way Range Superintendent had amended the order passed by the Commissioner and communicated to the appellant. On receipt of communication of the order from the Superintendent, the appellant has .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X