2002 (6) TMI 261

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... , for the Respondent. [Order per : G.A. Brahma Deva, Member (J) (Oral)]. -  These are two appeals filed by the appellants. Arguing in support of the application to condone the delay in filing these appeals, Shri Nagaraj accompanied by Shri T.R. Shastry, submitted that there was no delay in filing these appeals. He explained the circumstances under which the appellant was compelled to file t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rt had allowed the Civil appeal Nos. 52-63/98 and that the appellants were required to pay the penalty imposed by the adjudicating authority. The appellant's Counsel contended that in a way Range Superintendent had amended the order passed by the Commissioner and communicated to the appellant. On receipt of communication of the order from the Superintendent, the appellant has filed these two appea .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X