1995 (11) TMI 258

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... This is an appeal filed by the department against order-in-appeal passed by the Collector (Appeals), Madras. 2. We have heard Shri Vijay Singh, ld. JDR on behalf of the Revenue. The point to be considered in this case is whether removal of excisable goods to consignment agents for sale could be treated as sale to such consignment agents and if so, whether the assessable value of such consi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... not transactions of sale by appellants to their consignment agents but are only removals for sale by appellants at a place other than the place of removal, where such sales were effected by their consignment agents on their behalf. We find that it is an admitted fact that the goods are also sold at the factory gate to independent buyers and the assessable value has been determined with reference t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... It was contended by the Departmental Representative that in the facts and circumstances, the Collector (Appeals) ought to have treated the consignment agents as a separate class of buyers. We are not convinced with the arguments advanced by the Departmental Representative on this issue and on going through the facts and in view of the clear admitted position that the goods are sold at the factory .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X