2003 (5) TMI 293

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Justice K.K. Usha, President]. - This is an appeal at the instance of the assessee challenging the order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) dated 22/23-2-2003. 2. The appellants who are manufacturers of packet tea sell the same through their various depots located at different places. In their price declarations they have claimed deduction of amount .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... is based on the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CCE, New Delhi v. Vikram Detergent Ltd. reported in 2001 (127) E.L.T. 641. As mentioned earlier for denying the benefit of deduction in respect of interest on receivables, the only reason given by the Commissioner (Appeals) is that the element of this expenditure is not known beforehand. On facts the Commissioner (Appeals) is no .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X