Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2007 (10) TMI 508

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... l chemicals. They opened another unit No. 2 in Navi Mumbai in 1994 which was the bigger unit having 32 to 40 workers. During scrutiny of the records, it was noticed that they were repacking and relabelling certain goods falling under chapters 39 and 38 and their activity of repacking and relabelling amount to manufacture in respect of certain goods falling under chapters 29 and 38. They were availing credit in respect of goods which were repacked and relabelled by them. After repacking and relabelling, the goods were cleared by them to their unit by paying duty on the value at which the goods were initially purchased by them before repacking and relabelling. Since the activity undertaken by them amounted to manufacture, they were required t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... eir cost of production and profit on the basis of balance sheet supplied by them for the year ending 31st March, 2000-2001. On 16-1-2003, the jurisdictional Superintendent issued a letter to them asking to produce Cost Accountant s Certificate for their product for the period 2000 to 2002 and they replied vide their letter dated 10-2-2003 stating that they may be able to give the details as worked out by their accountant and the department may verify the same at their end. However, Revenue kept on asking for the Cost Accountant s Certificate which they being small unit could not give. New Valuation Rules were notified in 2000 but there was no clarity on the same and they were unable to understand as to what procedure should be followed. The .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... L.T. A-151 (S.C.) wherein The Tribunal in its order had held that non filing of declaration under Rule 173C of erstwhile Central Excise Rules was not with any intention to evade duty as revenue neutrality was established in the case. There was transfer of goods from one unit to another. Even if valuation was adopted on lower side at the time of clearance from Dankuni factory, it does not lead to any gain to comply. Hence demand for longer period of limitation and penalty was side. Similar decision was in the case of Indian Telephone Industries Ltd. v. CCE, Calicut - 2006 (201) E.L.T. 419 (Tri.-Bang.) 3. The learned SDR however submits that the appellants have not disclosed their activity of transferring the goods to their sister unit fo .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Accountant s certificate, they submitted in the February, 2004 did not disclose overheads in respect of the items repacked and relabelled by them but were of some other items. Though they are disputing the duty on merits they still have not suggested any value at which the duty can be worked out. In view of this, they suppressed the fact of captive consumption of goods, and therefore extended period has rightly been invoked. 4. As regards revenue neutrality, attention was invited to the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of CCE, Mumbai v. Mahindra Mahindra Ltd.-2005 (179) E.L.T. 21 (S.C.) wherein it was held that availability of Modvat credit to an assessee by itself not conclusive or decisive though it may be one of the relevan .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ted 13-9-2002 is misleading as it says These repacked and relabelled goods are also available for sale to other customers from Unit No.1 even though there is not a single instance from 1999 till 2003. We note that the department was prompt in reply by their letter dated 23-9-2002 and has been frequently asking them to produce the Cost Accountant s certificate which they never did. If it was the matter of revenue neutrality nothing prevented them from giving Cost Accountant s certificate instead disputing the cost of production arrived at by the Revenue once full set off duty was available to them. They have not filed any declaration under Rule 173C even though in case of goods solely used for captive consumption they were required to do s .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates