TMI Blog2007 (6) TMI 467X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s, JDR, for the Respondent [Order per : Chittaranjan Satapathy, Member (T)]. - Heard both sides. 2. Shri A.K. Bhattacharjee, ld. Consultant appearing for the Appellants states that the Appellants have not complied with the order of the pre-deposit dated 14-7-2006 [2008 (228) E.L.T. 481 (Tri.)] and seeks further time. Shri P.K. Das, ld. DR appearing for the Department states that when the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... emsp;We, however, find that the Presiding Member has recorded in her noting on the order sheet as follows :- "Order to deposit Rs. 50 lakhs. Signed. Be placed before M (T) and fixed for pronouncement." As such, we find that while the Presiding Member in her noting has clearly indicated that the Appellants should pre-deposit an amount of Rs. 50,00,000/- (Fifty lakhs) only which appears to be comm ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|