Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1956 (3) TMI 33

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 5, the following appears to be the system that was introduced for the purpose. Mill-made cloth available for consumption in the State was placed under four categories: (1) cloth purchased by quota-holders from the mills situate outside the south deficit zone (presumably the south deficit zone included Madras State); (2) cloth purchased by quota-holders from mills situate within that zone; (3) market purchases from surplus areas, and (4) foreign cloth. We are now concerned only with the third category, namely, market purchases from surplus areas. The plaintiff's case is that he functioned as a retail consignee for the distribution of the market quota. In order to purchase and distribute the monthly market quota, three representative dealerso .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... distribute the cloth with reference to the quotas allotted to the dealers concerned. No remuneration will be paid to those distributing retail dealers. The importing dealers concerned will, however, separately invoice all the retail dealers who are linked up with them and recover the amounts either direct, or, as the case may be, through the distributing retail dealers. The plaintiff comes under the category of reliable retail dealers and he is appointed as distributing retail dealer for breaking open the bales and making an equitable distribution in accordance with the quotas already fixed and to be diverted in respect of the consignments consigned by the importing dealers. For doing this work of distributing by breaking open the bales, th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... receiving payments from them and that he takes delivery of the goods from the wholesalers only on payment, implying thereby that the plaintiff was purchasing goods from the import dealers and then effecting transactions of sale with the retailers. The buying and selling has been found to be between the import dealer and the retailer to whom alone only the invoices are sent; but the invoices pass through the plaintiff and if it becomes necessary to make payments and take delivery for the purpose of distributing the goods to the retailers after breaking open, such payments the plaintiff has necessarily to make; but it is not necessarily the price of the goods but the amount required for transmitting the goods to the retailer. It is not clear .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates