2009 (1) TMI 733

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Jt. CDR, for the Respondent. ORDER Heard both sides. In these four cases, originally unconditional stay was granted by the Division Bench on 9-7-08. Since, six months have elapsed, the appellants have filed four miscellaneous applications for extension of stay granted earlier as it has not been possible by the Tribunal to take up the cases for final hearing in the meantime. Today, these cases we .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e respondent Commissioner. However, he agrees that no application for modification or revocation of the stay has so far been filed. He also submits that since the stay has originally been given by the Division Bench, extension of stay should also be granted by the Division Bench as the extension of stay would amount to granting another stay, which can only be given by the Division Bench. Only he n .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X