Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1967 (7) TMI 113

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of motor vehicles fitted with bodies with the Kerala State Electricity Board and some other customers in the State in these years. The main contention of the petitioners which is common in all these cases is that the contracts with the Kerala State Electricity Board and the other customers were only for the sale of Dodge chassis and bodies were fitted up on the chassis by Messrs. Simpson and Co., Madras, and Sree Rama Vilas Motor Service (Private) Ltd., arranged by the petitioners on behalf of the several purchasers at their request. The plea of the petitioners is that the contracts for the construction of bodies on Dodge chassis are not contracts of sale but only contracts of work and the turnover resulting therefrom has to be exempted fr .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ether the sales were of body-built chassis." It is agreed that the above statement embodies correctly the contentions raised by the petitioners. The assessing authorities as well as the Tribunal found that the contracts between the petitioners and the Kerala State Electricity Board and the other customers were not for sales of mere chassis alone but for vehicles, that is chassis fitted up with bodies of the types specifically mentioned by the purchasers. 4.. In T.R.C. No. 14 of 1966 the dispute relates to 18 vehicles of which 11 were supplied to the Kerala State Electricity Board while the remaining 7 were supplied to the other customers. It is agreed that there are no written agreements for the supply of 7 vehicles to customers other tha .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... os. 20 and 21 of 1966. The Appellate Tribunal has not entered any independent finding regarding the nature of the transaction which are the subject-matter of these revision cases. We accept the contention on behalf of the revision petitioner that the concession made before the Appellate Tribunal was only in respect of the transactions involed in T.R.C. No. 14 of 1966 and does not extend to the other two cases. If so, the Appellate Tribunal should be directed to dispose of Tribunal Appeals Nos. 663 and 664 of 1963 afresh. 5.. T.R.C. No. 14 of 1966 has to be disposed of on the merits. As already stated the main contention of the revision petitioners was that the contracts with the Kerala State Electricity Board were for sale of Dodge chassi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... for the supply of the disputed items. The earnest money paid by the petitioners for the due fulfilment of the contract was with reference to the total value of the vehicle that is chassis with the body constructed. The letter of acceptance shows that the vehicles are to be delivered in place in Kerala State. The contention that the property in the chassis passed to the Kerala Electricity Board at Bombay is without any substance at all. This argument of the petitioner's counsel was found upon the price of the chassis ex-plant Bombay given in the quotation. But this is only one of the items in the price quoted by the petitioners. The quotation given by the petitioners is for delivery of the vehicle in the different places in Kerala. The cont .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ioners. The security furnished for the fulfilment of the contract was also on the total value of the contract. From the copies of the bills furnished it is seen that in some cases separate invoices for the construction of the body are given. But in some other cases joint invoices are given. The fact that two separate invoices were given cannot be of much use in this case as the other documents establish beyond any doubt that the contract between the parties is for sale of chassis fitted up with bodies. The contract between the parties shows that it is with reference to a single item, i. e., chassis with the body fitted up and not for the sale of two items, namely, chassis and the body. The passing of property to the purchasers was in the ve .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates