1989 (1) TMI 324

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... h July, 1982 the account books of the assessee were rejected and a best judgment assessment was made. On appeal, the Assistant Commissioner (Judicial), however, accepted the book version of the assessee and allowed the appeal. Aggrieved, the Commissioner of Sales Tax filed second appeal before the Sales Tax Tribunal which has been allowed by the impugned order dated 25th June, 1987 and the order .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... al has found that non-mention of the aforesaid amount of payment casts a serious reflection on the veracity of the account books and the Tribunal has, therefore, held that the account books, so produced by the assessee, were not maintained in the regular course of business. A further finding of fact has been recorded by the Sales Tax Tribunal that the account books could have been manipulated. Th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e Sales Tax Tribunal was of the opinion that the account books did not show the correct extent of the business. The Tribunal also found that there was suppression of 400 quintals of rice till the month of May, 1982 that is for two months. In this situation, I am of the opinion that the Tribunal was right in holding that the account books could not be relied upon and the same were rightly rejected .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X