1989 (4) TMI 310

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... on 44(1) of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), the Board of Revenue has referred the following question of law to this Court for its opinion: "Whether under the facts and the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that penalty under section 17(3) of the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958, could not be imposed on the asses .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax held that in view of the fact that the assessee had filed revised return, penalty under section 43(1) of the Act could not have been imposed on the assessee as laid down in [1974] VKN 353 (National Garage, Nagpur v. President, Board of Revenue, M.P.). The Deputy Commissioner, however, held that penalty under section 17(3) of the Act could be imposed on the assesse .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... firmative and against the Department. In [1983] 54 STC 332; [1983] VKN 275 (Food Corporation of India v. Commissioner of Sales Tax, Madhya Pradesh), it has been held by this Court that while exercising powers under section 38(5) of the Act, the appellate authority has no jurisdiction to impose penalty for the first time. In view of this decision, the Board was justified in holding that the penalty .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X