9911796707
TMI Blog2011 (3) TMI 1229X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... against the order-in-appeal No.PI/264/03 dated 20/08/2003. 2. Heard both sides and perused the records. 3. The issue involved in this case is regarding the demand of differential duty during the period April 2000 to March 2001 in respect of the captively consumed goods. The show-cause notice proceeds on the grounds that the appellant is liable to pay differential duty as they have not in ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... is some error in calculation of duty in the show-cause notice. Instead of going into the factual matrix of the case, as to how the duty needs to be calculated; we are of the view that this issue should be gone into detail by the adjudicating authority and arrive at the correct duty liability of the appellants. In view of this without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, keeping all t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
