2012 (6) TMI 172

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tter was called out, learned counsel submits that the appellant has filed an application for condonation of delay in filing cross-objection filed by them against this particular appeal and the number is E/COD/855/12 in Cross Objection No. E/CO/16/12.   2. Learned counsel, at the outset submits that, under instructions he is withdrawing the application. Accordingly, the application for condon .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... le High Court of Karnataka was considering an identical issue as regards service tax credit on Rent-a-Cab service and also on Outdoor Catering services. I may with respect reproduce the entire judgment :-   1. The Revenue is before this Court in the appeal challenging the order passed by the Tribunal [2011 (21) S.T.R. 417 (Tribunal)], which has held that the Service tax paid by the assessee .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he substantial question of law framed in this appeal is answered in favour of the assessee and against the revenue.   3. Appeal stands dismissed.   6. It can be seen that now the issue is squarely settled by the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka in the judgment in the case of CCE Bangalore vs. Stanzen Toyotetsu India (P.) Limited, referred to in paragraph -2 in the above reproduced judgm .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X