2013 (1) TMI 380

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Inbarajan For Respondents: Mr. S. Kanmani Annamalai GA (T) ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, as well as the learned Government Advocate for taxes, appearing on behalf of the respondents.   2 The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is a registered dealer, on the files of the second respondent, under the provisions of the Tamilnadu Value Added Tax Act, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d 27.07.2012, without giving an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner, as per Rule 12-A of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Rules, 2007.   4 Per contra, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents had submitted that an opportunity of personal hearing would be given to a party asking for clarification, as per Rule 12-A of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Rules, 2007, on .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... oner, by its letter, dated 6.3.2012, after issuing a notice to the petitioner and by providing an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner. The second respondent shall pass such an order, as directed by this Court, as expeditiously as possible.   The writ petition is ordered accordingly. No cost. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Case laws, Decisions, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X