TMI Blog2013 (1) TMI 415X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ENTS: BY ADV. SRI. P.S. SREEDHARAN PILLAI, SCGSC SRI. K.K .RAJEEV, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR O R D E R This revision petition is filed at the instance of the 2nd accused in S.T.No.56 of 1997 of the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (Economic offences)-Ernakulam, who faced the prosecution along with another accused, which is a company, of which the petitioner is its Managing Director, for an ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t is the above finding and order of conviction challenged at the instance of the revision petitioner, who is the 2nd accused, by filing Crl.A.No.539 of 2000. 3. As the appellant, who is the revision petitioner herein, has failed to prosecute the appeal by furnishing address of the 2nd respondent, which is the 1st accused in S.T.No.56 of 1997 of which the revision petitioner/ appellant is the Mana ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... who is the 2nd respondent in the revision petition, has already wound up long back and the present address is not known. I am unable to sustain the above contention and submission of the learned counsel for the revision petitioner. No convincing explanation is forthcoming from the part of the revision petitioner in not taking steps at appropriate time and stage. In the result, I find no reason t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|