HC allowed the appeal, finding that procedural irregularities in ...

Procedural Defects Cannot Override Substantive Rights: Appeal Allowed with Opportunity to Rectify Technical Errors Under Section 107

May 15, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

HC allowed the appeal, finding that procedural irregularities in filing should not defeat the petitioner's substantive rights. The court held that technical defects do not warrant automatic rejection of an appeal, particularly where the delay is within the condonable period under Section 107 of the GST Act. The petitioner was granted an opportunity to rectify the procedural deficiencies in the appeal filing, emphasizing that procedural requirements are meant to facilitate justice, not obstruct it. The court's ruling underscores the principle that technical non-compliance should not supersede the fundamental right to seek judicial remedy.

View Source

← Previous Next →

HC allowed the appeal, finding that procedural irregularities in ...

Procedural Defects Cannot Override Substantive Rights: Appeal Allowed with Opportunity to Rectify Technical Errors Under Section 107

May 15, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

Dismissal of an appeal by the appellate authority due to procedural defects, including the failure to submit a Board Resolution appointing the authorized signatory, the...

HC allowed the Petitioner's appeal, setting aside the Impugned Order-in-Appeal and Rectification Order. The court found that Respondent No. 2 violated principles of...

Initiation of CIRP - since the affidavit not having been notarized is only a procedural irregularity and it is a curable defect. This irregularity can be rectified by...

Time Limitation - Curable Defect - Electronic Filing Compliance - Procedural Compliances vs. Substantive Rights: - The High Court found that the petitioners complied...

Maintainability of appeal - The Commissioner (Appeal) was not justified in deciding the matter on merits after having come to a conclusion that the appeal is to be...

Section 90 of the Income Tax Act allows relief from double taxation by granting foreign tax credits (FTCs) on foreign income taxed in both India and the other country....

HC set aside GST assessment order due to absence of assessing officer's signature, holding it as a fatal procedural defect. The court determined that signature...

HC held that systematic failure to provide personal hearing violates principles of natural justice under Section 75(4) of GST Act, 2017. The ex-parte assessment and...

HC condoned a 35-day delay in filing GST appeal, emphasizing that procedural delays should not override substantive justice. The petitioner had demonstrated compliance...

HC held that principles of natural justice were violated when petitioner was denied personal hearing despite sufficient time between response filing and order issuance....

CENVAT Credit - failure to distribute credit on certain common input services and transition to GST - It is only a procedural lapse and it will not affect the...

ITAT determined that Section 249(4)(b) was inapplicable due to specific procedural circumstances. The tribunal found the statutory requirements for advance tax payment...

Grant of export incentives under Merchandise Exports from India Scheme (MEIS) - seeking reopening of online portal to allow the petitioner to rectify the inadvertent...

HC determined the Additional Commissioner erred in adopting an overly restrictive interpretation regarding appeal filing timelines. The petitioner's contention that the...

Appellate Tribunal set aside Adjudicating Authority's order rejecting Section 9 application as defective without issuing notice to rectify defects within seven days as...

Quick Updates: