9911796707
TMI Blog2013 (1) TMI 562X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... y petition is filed for the waiver of pre-deposit of penalty imposed by the adjudicating authority on the appellant under the provisions of Section 114(i) of Customs Act, 1962 for trying illegally to export prohibited goods i.e. Peacock Feathers. 2. After hearing both sides for substantial time, we find that appeal itself could be disposed of at this juncture as there is claim by the appel ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the appellant had in fact, vide his interim reply dated 14.6.2011 filed though his advocate specifically requested for grant of personal hearing. We find that the appellant vide his letter dated 04.6.2012 addressed to The Commissioner of Customs, Custom House, Ahmedabad again reminded that he has not received any communication from their office. The order in original seems to have been passed on ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... to the adjudicating authority i.e. Commissioner of Customs, Ahmedabad. On such compliance being reported, learned Commissioner will hear the appellant and pass the order on merits of an case, after following the principles of natural justice. 6. It is made clear that if the appellant is not reporting compliance of order of pre-deposit on 24.1.2013, Commissioner is free to pass an order as ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
