TMI Blog2013 (3) TMI 129X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... with the directions of FAA and caused a delay of more than 100 days in providing complete information to the appellant to his RTI-request dated 11-5-2011. A separate show-cause notice u/s 20(1) of the RTI Act would be issued to Assistant Registrar & CPIO and Registrar & deemed CPIO, CESTAT asking them to show cause why a penalty of Rs. 25,000/- should not be imposed upon him. The Commission als ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... espondent were represented by Shri Naresh Kumar, Deputy Registrar, Shri S.K. Verma, Assistant Registrar and Shri S. Chandran, Registrar. 2. The appellant filed an application dated 11-5-2011 under the RTI Act, 2005, in which he sought the following information - (A) Please provide copy of the interim report submitted by the Inquiry Committee in September 2009 on perusal of which the Hon ble P ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... it a fresh report. So there is no valid reason to claim any exemption from providing the information called for by the appellant. The FAA directed the CPIO to call for the information requested for by the appellant from the Registrar CESTAT and furnish it to the appellant within 10 days from the date of order. In compliance with the FAA s direction Shri S.K. Verma, Assistant Registrar CPIO vide ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... emed CPIO also did not provide the information sought by the appellant in para 4(A) and 4(B) of his RTI application in spite of orders of the FAA. 5. The Commission is of the view that Shri S.K. Verma, Assistant Registrar CPIO and Shri S. Chandran, Registrar deemed CPIO, CESTAT have prima facie failed to comply with the directions of FAA and caused a delay of more than 100 days in providing ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
