2013 (3) TMI 158

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ned counsel for the revisionist and Sri U.K. Pandey, learned Standing counsel for the respondent. The revision is directed against the order of seizure which has been upheld upto the tribunal. Learned counsel for the parties agree for final disposal of the revision at the outset. The case of the revisionist is that it had purchased a Crane from M/s. Hercules Cranes Private Limited, Ghaziabad vi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e. Bhiwadi District Alwar of Rajasthan but was being exported to West Bengal from Ghaziabad itself. In this connection, the authorities primarily relied upon the statement of the driver. The submission of Sri Suyash Agrawal, learned counsel for the revisionist is that the authorities in passing the seizure order have not considered the material which the revisionist has produced along with his re .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ce of evidence which have completely been ignored by the tribunal. The non consideration of the said documents vitiates the order of the tribunal. Accordingly, the tribunal's order dated 5.2.2013 is set aside and the matter is remanded for its reconsideration with the direction to pass a fresh order in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of one month from t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X