1999 (3) TMI 593

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... lam respectively and prepared shop inspection report recording the complete physical stock of certain items of goods. Stock analysis disclosed stock variations in certain items below 0.3 grams. This led to the imposition of penalty. The penalty was reduced to Rs. 25,000 by exhibit P4 order of the Deputy Commissioner in revision. The main point stressed by the petitioner is that at the time of in .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... counts the petitioner produced the closing stock inventory as on March 31, 1989 before the Intelligence Officer. The Sales Tax Officer, First Circle signed the same on November 15, 1989. Therefore, there is no definite finding by the authorities regarding quantum of tax said to have been evaded. Since tax said to have been evaded is not quantified, maximum penalty that can be imposed is only Rs. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X