TMI Blog2014 (3) TMI 912X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... espect of Cenvat credit availed by the assessee-respondent on the inputs used for drawing of wire. It is also not disputed that the final product cleared by the respondent-assessee is on payment of appropriate duty during the relevant period. We find that the learned Commissioner (Appeals) has correctly come to the conclusion that the disallowment of Cenvat credit is not in accordance with the law ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... y Revenue against Order-in-Appeal No. 164/C.E./DLH/2004 dated 14-12-2004. 2. The relevant facts that arise for consideration are that the respondents herein availed Cenvat credit of duty on inputs i.e. copper wire/copper wire rods and are engaged in the manufacturing of copper wire and copper strips. Show cause notice dated 11-2-2004 was issued to the respondents for seeking reversal of Cenvat ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t of the duty paid on inputs is not eligible as per the provisions of Rule 6(1) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002. It is his submission that since the respondents has availed the Cenvat credit which is not eligible during the relevant period, the order of the adjudicating authority is correct and should be restored by setting aside the impugned order as the period involved in this case is between the 2 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nfirmed by the adjudicating authority and set aside by the learned Commissioner (Appeals) is in respect of Cenvat credit availed by the assessee-respondent on the inputs used for drawing of wire. It is also not disputed that the final product cleared by the respondent-assessee is on payment of appropriate duty during the relevant period. We find that the learned Commissioner (Appeals) has correctl ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
