1982 (1) TMI 196

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... lly considered the submissions in the revision application and those urged at the time of hearing. 2. The facts of the case briefly are that the petitioners who are manufacturers of electric fans sell their fans under the brand names of Bajaj and Kassels. The Bajaj brand fans are sold through M/s. Bajaj Electricals Ltd. who act as sole selling agents for Bajaj fans and the Kassels brand fans .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... wns etc. They have referred to an earlier order of the Government of India in the case of Jagjit Industries reported in 1978 ELT J 205 and contended that the agency commission given by them to Bajaj is admissible for deductions. Regarding the distributors discount of 8.5% given by them to five regional distributors, they have stated that there were trade discounts given in the normal course of bus .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nment are, however, unable to accept the petitioner's claim for the 1% agency commission on the sale of Kassels brand fans through the five regional distributors. The commission given to Bajaj Electricals Ltd. on the sale of Kassels fans through the five distributors could not be said to be in the nature of a trade discount. Under Section 4 only trade discounts are permissible for deduction. Gover .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X