2014 (11) TMI 799

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e Tax -II, who is the second respondent herein, rejecting an application for stay. 2. Heard Dr.Anita Sumanth, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr.T.Pramod Kumar Chopda, learned Standing Counsel takes notice for the respondents. 3. The short ground on which the petitioner challenges the impugned order is that after filing an appeal and moving a stay petition and suffering an order for payment .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d respondent. Alternatively, it could be true that it was placed, but he did not take note of it. In either case, the impugned order is vitiated either for non-application of mind or for not having the benefit of the order of the Appellate Tribunal. Therefore, irrespective of who is right, the impugned order should go. 6. Therefore, the writ petition is allowed; the impugned order is set aside an .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X