2015 (1) TMI 594

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... hri B Kumar Iyer, Superintendent (AR) JUDGEMENT Per: Ashok Jindal: The appellant is in appeal against the impugned order wherein service tax demand of Rs. 69,44,352/- along with interest and various amount of penalties under the Finance Act, 1994 have been confirmed against the appellant for the period 1.10.2007 to 31.3.2008 restricting the utilization of credit to 20% of the Tax and payable on .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... on of Cenvat Credit and same was demanded along with interest and penalty was also made. The show cause notice was adjudicated, converted into impugned order, therefore the appellant is before us. 2. The Ld. Consultant appeared on behalf of the appellant and submits that after issuance of the show cause notice. The appellant had paid the service tax on exempted service i.e. services provided to S .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... issuance of the show cause notice, therefore, Cenvat Credit cannot be denied. To support this contention, he relied on the decision of Everest Convertors Vs. CCE reported in 1995 (80) ELT 91 (Tri.) 3. On the other hand, the Ld. A.R. reiterated the finding of the impugned order. 4. Heard both sides. Considered the submissions. 5. In this case initially the appellant has claimed exemption under N .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X