TMI Blog1962 (2) TMI 79X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e are two appeals directed against the order of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh reiecting a Reference made by the Sessions Judge against the prosecution of. the appellant for contravening the provisions of the C. P. and Berar Sales Tax Act (C. P. XXI of 1947), hereinafter called the Act . A firm of which five brothers including the two appellants were partners submitted their sales tax return ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ourt for quashing the proceedings But the High Court rejected the reference on the ground that a person making a false return neither acts nor purports to act under the Act and therefore s. 26(2) is not applicable to him. It is against that order that these peals were brought by Special Leave. In order to decide this question, it is necessary to refer to the relevant provisions of the Act. Unde ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ollows S. 26 (1) No suit, prosecution or other legal proceedings shall lie against any servant of the Government for anything which is in good faith done or intended to be done under this Act or rules made thereunder. (2) No suit shall be instituted against the Government and no prosecution or suit shall be instituted against any person in respect of anything done or intended to be done under th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... no words restricting the meaning of any person and no reason has been shown why those words should not include the appellants. The ground on which the High Court rejected the Reference was that in its opinion the appellants neither acted nor purported to act under any of the provisions of the Act when they filed false returns or produced false accounts and in fact they were rendering. themsel ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
