9911796707
TMI Blog2015 (5) TMI 532X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ORDER Petitioner is stated as aggrieved of the course and proceedings pursued by the concerned respondent in finalising the proceedings, imposing penalty to the tune of Rs. 3,00,880/- for the assessment year 2010-11 and also finalising the assessment based on the facts and figures, which were relied on for mulcting the penalty. The petitioner is a licensee under the KMMC Rules, 1967 and in co ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... bserving that the petitioner has already remitted a sum of Rs. 1,09,520/-, out of the total disputed penalty of Rs. 3,00,880/- at the first appellate stage and in turn granting interim stay for one month, directing the petitioner to produce proof of utilization /surrender of 'P' Forms, bearing Sl.No.201 to 360 issued by the Mining and Geology Department within one month's time. It is s ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he petitioner has not satisfied the condition and appeal is pending. 3. The case projected by the petitioner is that since all the relevant documents have already been produced particularly in the light of direction contained in Ext.P16 order, if the Revision Petition is finalised within a reasonable time it will vindicate the stand of the petitioner. 4. Heard the learned Government Pleader as w ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... any delay and that the petitioner was expecting favourable orders from the revisional authority/third respondent. It is also pointed out that the petitioner is ready and willing to satisfy the said condition, for which short time is sought for. 7. The learned Government Pleader points out that if the petitioner proves his bonafides by effecting deposit within 'ten days', the matter can be ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
