2011 (3) TMI 1566

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Shri C. Seethapathy, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri C. Dhanasekaran, SDR, for the Respondent. ORDER The miscellaneous application for amendment in appeal memorandum by showing the correct date of receipt of the impugned order as 13-3-2010 instead of 1-3-2010, wrongly mentioned in the appeal memorandum is allowed. 2. Now we take up the application for waiver of pre-deposit of duty of & .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e, the question of classification under the heading under which the equipments fall does not arise and therefore, prima facie, the payment of duty of 8% itself is in order. At this stage, we do not go into the question as to whether duty was not required to be paid in terms of S. No. 27 of the Table to Notification No. 6/06-C.E., dated 1-3-2006, as duty @ 8% already stands paid by the applicant. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X