9911796707
TMI Blog1998 (7) TMI 684X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ry, Forest Range, Rampur, to the petitioners vide communication dated January 18, 1998, based on the injunction issued by this Court on 12-12-1996 and 4-3-1997 in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 202 of 1995 has been put in issue in this Writ Petition. Mr. Sharma, learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the authority was not "required" to go by the orders of this Court, which according ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... les of State Policy finding place in Part-IV of the Constitution of India which only allowed the competent Legislature to enact laws for enforcing the said Directive Principles and which did not by themselves had the force of law under which the Hon'ble Court could pass the order in question dated 4-3-97. Again the petitioners aver in para 26 thus: BECAUSE an ad hoc order like the order in q ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... not bring about such amendment by merely passing some order in a PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION. 3. The relief claimed by the petitioner, in this petition, is as follows: (i) to issue a writ of mandamus or writ, direction or order in the nature thereof or any other writ, direction or order directing the Respondents not to interfere with the fundamental right of the petitioners to continue to run and ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... stion the correctness of the orders of this Court through a writ petition under Article 32, which is not permissible. The objection with regard to the office report is also not tenable. Filing of such a petition is an abuse of the process of the Court and waste of the time of the Court. We do not find any merit in this petition which is dismissed with costs, assessed at ₹ 10,000/-. 5. The c ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
