1995 (10) TMI 226

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 13, 1995 JUDGMENT R. K. Gulati, J. - This is revision under Section 11 of U. P. Sales Tax Act filed at the instance of Commissioner of Sales Tax, U. P., Lucknow. The dispute relates to the assessment year 1980 - 81. The question raised in the revision reads as follows : "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the Sales Tax Tribunal was legally justified to hold that the assessee .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... n the hands of the assessee. In due course the matter came to be considered before the Sales Tax Tribunal, Ghaziabad, which set aside the reassessment order and recorded the findings that the purchaser M/s. Sudhakarmal Shermal, aforesaid had issued Form 'F' to the assessee against which the goods were sold. The subsequent denial on the part of the purchaser was of no consequence, for, the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ibunal were uncalled for. The respondent assessee was not given any opportunity to cross - examine the Delhi dealer. The Tribunal has rightly held, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, that if the purchaser who had issued Form 'F' to the assessee had not entered the goods in his account books than the assessee cannot be held responsible for the same. Further the reassessmen .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X