2013 (8) TMI 929

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... JUDGMENT G. Raghuram (President) Heard the ld. Consultant for the appellant and Shri B.B. Sharma, ld. Authorised Representative for the respondent/Revenue. At the stage of stay application, since substantive appeal falls in a narrow compass we dispose of the appeal itself on merits. We waive the pre-deposit required and proceed to dispose of the appeal. 2. The appeal is preferred agai .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... .2012 and 5.12.2012. There was however no appearance on behalf of the appellant. Eventually, by the order dated 9.12.2012, the lower appellate authority disposed of the stay application, directing deposit of ₹ 10 lakhs within 15 days from the receipt of this order as a condition precedent for waiver of pre-deposit of penalty in the appeal. The appellant did not comply with the requirement of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X