Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2015 (12) TMI 1427

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ies, the court is of the view that the matters require consideration, hence, admit. The following substantial question of law arises for determination in each appeal:- "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Gujarat Value Added Tax Tribunal was right in law in directing payment of pre-deposit of tax as well as interest amount for both the years?" 3. In view of the fact that the controversy involved in the present case lies in a very narrow compass, the appeals were taken up for hearing today. 4. The facts stated briefly are that assessment proceedings came to be initiated in the case of the petitioner which culminated into assessment orders confirming a total demand of Rs. 2,56,15,765/- comprising of tax of Rs. 8 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ring issued by the first appellate authority. The first appellate authority without carrying out any further procedure for service of notice of hearing, dismissed the appeals by an order dated 29th April, 2014. The assessee carried the matters in appeal before the Tribunal. The Tribunal, by an order dated 5th September, 2014, directed the appellant to make payment of the tax as well as interest for assessment year 2002-03 by giving credit of the amount of Rs. 5,00,000/- which was paid by the appellant in the first round and directed the appellant to pay the balance amount of tax together with interest within a period of one month and adjourned the appeals for further hearing to 8th October, 2014. On 4th October, 2014, the appellant filed af .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... hat no reasons have been assigned by the Tribunal as to why the appellant is required to be directed to pay the entire tax as well as interest. It was submitted that the impugned order being a non-speaking as well as an unreasonable order, deserves to be set aside and the appeals deserve to be allowed. 7. Opposing the appeals, Mr. Bhargav Pandya, learned Assistant Government Pleader submitted that the tax amount itself is more than Rs. 80,00,000/- and together with interest and penalty, the figure comes to more than Rs. 2,50,00,000/-, under the circumstances, the Tribunal was wholly justified in directing pre-deposit of the tax and interest as a pre-condition for hearing the appeals. It was submitted that the amount which has been deposite .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... a period of six years. After a period of six years, notice of hearing came to be issued to the appellant. In the meanwhile, the business premises of the appellant had been sealed. Under the circumstances, the appellant was not aware of the hearing fixed by the first appellate authority as the notice of hearing had been pasted on the closed premises. The first appellate authority, in view of the fact that the appellant had not remained present for personal hearing, confirmed the earlier order passed by it. In the second round, the Tribunal on the same set of facts has now directed the appellant to pre-deposit the entire tax amount together with interest which comes to more than Rs. 1,25,00,000/-. While directing the appellant to pre-deposit .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ight of the above discussion, the question is answered in the negative, namely, that the Gujarat value Added Tax Tribunal was not justified in directing payment of pre-deposit of the entire tax amount together with interest. 11. In the result, the appeals succeed and are accordingly allowed. The impugned orders dated 5th September, 2014 and 8th October, 2014 passed by the Tribunal are hereby quashed and set aside. The appeals are restored to the file of the Tribunal, which shall decide the same in accordance with law after affording a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the appellant. The stay applications filed by the appellant before the Tribunal are hereby allowed subject to pre-deposit of the amount of Rs. 8,45,000/- which amount has .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates