2015 (12) TMI 1439

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ndent : Shri R.K. Mishra, DR ORDER Per Ashok Jindal: The appellant is in appeal against the impugned order denying Cenvat Credit on steel items like Plates, Channels, Joists, Beams, Flats, etc. for the period July 2004 to march 2005. The contention of the Revenue is that these items are neither inputs nor capital goods. Therefore, they are not entitled to take Cenvat Credit thereon. In earlier .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ms i.e. 146.925 MT of Cenvat Credit which is used for fabrication of capital goods. Therefore, appellant is entitled to take Cenvat Credit. He further submits that both the lower authorities have discarded certificate issued by Chartered Engineer who is an expert in the field without assigning any reason. Therefore, impugned order is to be set aside. 3. On the other hand Ld. AR supported the impu .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tions of the chartered engineer which have been relied by the appellant have been discarded by the authorities below without any tangible evidence. Merely saying that all the items were used for supporting structure is not admissible evidence. Therefore, as the appellant has been able to show the usage of the items in question for fabrication of capital goods as directed by this Tribunal in the ea .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X