9911796707
TMI Blog2013 (2) TMI 736X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... . Hari Haran, Adv., Ms. Charu Mathur,Adv. For the Respondent Mr. J.M. Sharma, Adv., Mr. Raka B. Phookan, Adv., Ms. Neha Tandon Phookan, Adv., Mr. Shailesh Madiyal ,Adv ORDER The special leave petition is dismissed in terms of the signed order. Since the special leave petition has been dismissed, no orders are required to be passed on the application for impleadment as party respondent. (Signe ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 79 of 2007. The Division Bench has dismissed the review petition on the ground that in substance, the applicant seeks rehearing of Writ Appeal No. 279 of 2007 on the basis of certain facts, which were not brought to the notice of the Court at the time of hearing of the appeal. It is not disputed before us that judgment and order dated 20th November, 2007 passed in Writ Appeal No. 279 of 2007 was ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... followed by this Court in Suseel Finance and Leasing Company versus M. Lata and others reported in (2004) 13 SCC 675. This Court held that not only was it bound by the aforesaid judgment in Shanker Motiram Nale case, but was also in agreement with it. The law laid down in both the aforesaid judgments was further reiterated in the case of M.N. Haider and others versus Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ourt appeal got merged in the order of review petition. But even otherwise, when the order passed in the review petition is challenged, it would not be proper to dismiss this appeal particularly when leave was granted in SLP after hearing the parties. We, therefore, reject the objection raised by the writ petitioner." A perusal of the aforesaid paragraph would clearly show that the judgments notic ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
