9911796707
TMI Blog2000 (11) TMI 1235X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... yana High Court in four different writ petitions. The appellants in each of the appeals had applied for the post in Haryana Civil Services (Executive Branch) for which post advertisement had been issued by the Public Service Commission. Though the number of posts tentatively had been indicated in the advertisement but it was stipulated that the vacancy position may change. The advertisement in que ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... and the fresh examination can be held only in respect of the vacancies available subsequent thereto. The High Court, however, by the impugned judgment did not accept the contentions of the appellants relying upon the earlier decision of the said Court in the case of Virender S. Hooda v. State of Haryana as well as some other decisions. The writ petition having been dismissed, the present appeals ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... itled only to send the list of selected candidates in respect of vacancies for which the requisition had been made and advertisement was issued and not any further future vacancies. According to him, the judgment of this Court in Hooda did not consider the subsequent circular of the Government in the year 1993. It is no doubt true that the reported decision of this Court in Hooda does not refer to ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... to hold that the circular says the same thing that we have indicated earlier in this judgment. In the aforesaid premises, we set aside the impugned judgments of the Punjab and Haryana High Court and allow these appeals and writ petitions and direct that these four persons, who had appeared at the competitive test in the year 1993 pursuant to the advertisement dated 24/12/1992 should be considered ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
