TMI Blog2008 (2) TMI 161X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 7-2002, which set aside the order-in-original. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellant filed a refund claim for Rs. 60,716/- on the ground of excess payment of special excise duty by over sight. The said refund was sanctioned by the adjudicating authority holding that the refund claim was within time-limit. Aggrieved by such order the Revenue preferred an order before the Commission ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... under:. "3. Respondents were given opportunity to file cross-objection, and also opportunities for personal hearing on three different dates, while written submissions were filed, personal hearing was not attended. Accordingly, the subject appeal is being disposed of after considering the submissions made in written rejoinder, grounds urged in appeal and the law governing this subject." 6. It c ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|